Where You Can Get the Newest HighTech-IT and Gadgets Reviews
 
 

5/4/07

Top Backup Software

Top Backup Software
Move beyond your bundled software with one of these backup utilities.

Edited by Danny Allen

  1. NovaStor NovaBackup 7.3
    Bottom Line: Affordable app is particularly easy to use, includes a wide range of features, and supports most current media types.
    PC World Rating: 86 (Very Good)
    Price when rated: $50
    Documentation: Superior
    Ease of backup creation: Very Good
    Ease of backup restoration: Very Good

  2. Roxio BackUp MyPC Deluxe 2006
    Bottom Line: Though unchanged since its last incarnation, BackUp MyPC is still a highly capable backup program.
    PC World Rating: 83 (Very Good)
    Price when rated: $50
    Documentation: Very Good
    Ease of backup creation: Very Good
    Ease of backup restoration: Very Good

  3. Genie-Soft Genie Backup Manager Professional 7.0
    Bottom Line: Simple-to-use package offers exceptional media support and some great features, but it lacks disaster-recovery tools.
    PC World Rating: 76 (Good)
    Price when rated: $170
    Documentation: Fair
    Ease of backup creation: Very Good
    Ease of backup restoration: Very Good

  4. EMC Retrospect 7.5 Professional
    Bottom Line: Powerful software provides numerous advanced features, but its complex interface makes it better suited to IS pros.
    PC World Rating: 75 (Good)
    Price when rated: $119
    Documentation: Superior
    Ease of backup creation: Good
    Ease of backup restoration: Very Good

  5. Uniblue WinBackup 2.0 Standard
    Bottom Line: Application is easy to use but lacks disaster-recovery functions; backing up open files, as with Genie, costs extra.
    PC World Rating: 74 (Good)
    Price when rated: $50
    Documentation: Fair
    Ease of backup creation: Very Good
    Ease of backup restoration: Very Good

Content by:

Read More......

Top Antivirus Software

Top Antivirus Software

This low-cost antivirus tool performed the best in our heuristics tests and caught the widest range of malwareEdited by Narasu Rebbapragada

Edited by Narasu Rebbapragada


  1. BitDefender 9 Standard
    Bottom Line: Inexpensive product received excellent scores in our performance tests, although its scan speed was sluggish.
    PC World Rating: 92 (Superior)
    Performance: Superior
    Ease of Use: Very Good
    Features: Very Good
    Price when ranked: $30>

  2. McAfee VirusScan 2006
    Bottom Line: Relatively good heuristics help VirusScan provide solid protection. Phone support costs $3 per minute.
    PC World Rating: 87 (Very Good)
    Performance: Superior
    Ease of Use: Very Good
    Features: Very Good
    Price when ranked: $40>

  3. Kaspersky Lab Kaspersky Anti-Virus Personal 5.0
    Bottom Line: Program had the fastest response to new malware outbreaks. Interface is clean but not exceptional.
    PC World Rating: 85 (Very Good)
    Performance: Superior
    Ease of Use: Good
    Features: Good
    Price when ranked: $40>

  4. F-Secure Anti-Virus 2006
    Bottom Line: Solid performer responded quickly in tests and provides best breaking news on malware outbreaks.
    PC World Rating: 83 (Very Good)
    Performance: Superior
    Ease of Use: Good
    Features: Good
    Price when ranked: $40>

  5. Symantec Norton AntiVirus 2006
    Bottom Line: Veteren utility offers solid threat detection and a nice interface. Phone support costs $30 per incident.
    PC World Rating: 80 (Very Good)
    Performance: Good
    Ease of Use: Very Good
    Features: Very Good
    Price when ranked: $40>

  6. Panda Software Panda Titanium 2006 Antivirus + Antispyware
    Bottom Line: This former Best Buy performed well, but not exceptionally, in our newest nonspyware tests.
    PC World Rating: 79 (Good)
    Performance: Very Good
    Ease of Use: Good
    Features: Very Good
    Price when ranked: $50>

  7. AntiVir Personal Edition Classic 6.32
    Bottom Line: AntiVir performed the best of the free programs, although it failed to clean several old macro viruses.
    PC World Rating: 78 (Good)
    Performance: Good
    Ease of Use: Good
    Features: Fair
    Price when ranked: Free

  8. Alwil Software Avast Home Edition 4.6
    Bottom Line: Free product has a slick media-player-style interface that hides some features. Scan speed was slow in tests.
    PC World Rating: 77 (Good)
    Performance: Fair
    Ease of Use: Very Good
    Features: Good
    Price when ranked: Free

  9. Trend Micro PC-cillin Internet Security Security 2006
    Bottom Line: Former Best Buy performed poorly in heuristics and zoo tests but has the best interface of the bunch.
    PC World Rating: 77 (Good)
    Performance: Fair
    Ease of Use: Superior
    Features: Good
    Price when ranked: $50>

  10. Grisoft AVG Free Edition 7.1
    Bottom Line: Free program has subpar heuristics and one of the clunkier interfaces among the products we tested.
    PC World Rating: 73 (Good)
    Performance: Fair
    Ease of Use: Fair
    Features: Fair
    Price when ranked: Free
Content by:


CONTINUED: Top Antivirus Software

Read More......

5/2/07

How to Buy a Laptop

How to Buy a Laptop
The most highly evolved species of computer, the laptop (aka notebook) computer allows you to work without being tethered to an office. Portability and good performance make notebook PCs an essential part of the daily lives of millions, from college students to business travelers. Even the least-expensive of today's laptops are better equipped than they have ever been, and may be all you need for everyday work.


The Big PictureThere are more laptop choices than ever. We'll guide you through the available options--including screen size, weight, battery life, and communications ports.The Specs ExplainedDo you need a superfast CPU? Or a huge hard drive? We'll guide you through the choices and tell you which features are most critical.Notebook Shopping Tips Looking for a powerful, versatile notebook at a reasonable price? Our advice will help you find the right laptop._______________________________________________________________The Big PictureIf you've ever shopped for a notebook, you know that the factors to consider go far beyond performance and connections. Notebook buyers also have to mull such variables as size, weight, screen dimensions, battery life, and keyboard quality--not to mention options such as built-in wireless.Key FeaturesProcessor

Intel's Pentium M processor has helped notebooks gain new ground in the power department. In our tests, notebooks using the Pentium M performed considerably faster than those using the Mobile Pentium 4. Pentium M processors also allow for long battery life. You can still opt for a Mobile Pentium 4 processor, such as one at 3.0 GHz, but most notebook vendors are moving to incorporate the Pentium M in all classes of notebooks.Some notebooks use AMD's Athlon Turion 64 processor or Intel's ULV (ultra-low voltage) Pentium M CPU, which also allow for improved battery life and performance. A few notebooks use Intel Pentium 4 or AMD's Athlon 64 desktop processors, which can give them a performance advantage as long as they're built to withstand--and you can tolerate--the extra heat they generate.Low-end notebooks offer Intel's cheaper Celeron M processor, which is generally not as speedy as the Pentium M processor, and which does not include Intel's Centrino Mobile technology.System memory

Unless you're buying on the cheap, a new notebook generally includes 512MB of system memory. Don't settle for anything less than 256MB if you want to do more than word processing and e-mail, because Windows XP and newer applications need at least that much memory.Many notebooks are now available with 1GB of RAM. Buying up to 1GB of RAM at the same time you purchase your notebook will help extend its useful lifetime.Graphics memory

You'll want 64MB or 128MB of dedicated video RAM, or VRAM, if you plan to use your laptop to drive external monitors for presentations. Make sure the memory is dedicated for graphic use, rather than pulled from main memory; this is sometimes referred to as a universal (UMA) or shared (SMA) memory architecture, or as dynamic video memory technology. Gamers should look for advanced 3D graphics chips, such as nVidia's GeForce Go 6800 Ultra, and 256MB of dedicated graphics memory.Screen

Notebook screens continue to get bigger--and most have gone wide, enabling you to view spreadsheets or movies with ease. Even budget shoppers can afford the luxury of high-resolution color: Portables with 14.1-inch and 15.4-inch wide-screens now cost as little as $1200. Most notebook manufacturers also offer laptops with 17-inch wide-screens. Frequent business fliers can choose among the many laptops that have the more-compact screen sizes of 12.1 and 13.3 inches--some of which are wide-screen, as well.Notebooks with standard aspect 14.1- and 15-inch screens can still be found, but they're not as plentiful as wide-screen models.


Battery

Notebook battery life took a step forward with the introduction of the Pentium M. In our tests, battery life in units equipped with that processor have averaged roughly 3.5 hours on one battery. Some notebooks can run for up to 7 hours. Many vendors also offer supplemental batteries to boost battery life.Keyboard and pointing device

Though you can get accustomed to almost any notebook keyboard, it's best to try before you buy. Thin-and-light notebooks usually have smaller-than-average keys spaced more closely than on a desktop-replacement model, and their layouts may differ from a standard keyboard's. You probably won't be given a choice between an eraserhead or trackpad pointing device; if you have a preference, look for manufacturers that use your preferred pointing device on the majority of their products.Optical and other drives

Most manufacturers offer notebooks with rewritable DVD drives, some of which are also dual-layer. It's still possible to get a notebook with a combination DVD-ROM and CD-RW drive. Few machines feature one or the other. If you really need a floppy drive, you can buy a USB add-on drive for less than $100.Long predicted to go extinct, the floppy drive has outlasted its SuperDrive and Zip drive challengers and continues to appear in many full-size notebooks, though sometimes only as an option. You can buy a USB add-on floppy drive for less than $100 if you really need it.Hard drive

You may not need the space, but notebook hard drives will continue to grow. Cheaper notebooks with 40GB hard drives are hard to find, but you can still save money by opting for a 60GB model. A top-of-the-line 120GB drive will set you back a few hundred dollars if you purchase it when you order your laptop. You can easily remove most laptop hard drives if you decide you want to upgrade or just keep your data safe.Weight and bay design

Notebooks range from 17-pound behemoth desktop replacements to 8- or 10-pound all-in-one models, with the optical drive built in, to 3-pound ultraportables that rely on external drives. One-bay notebooks have become more prevalent because of their appealing balance of features and weight.Many laptops offer the optical drive as a modular device, so you can swap it out for a second hard drive or a second battery.When making a purchase, you should consider the weight not only of the notebook, but of the AC adapter, any external modules, and their cables. Ultraportable notebooks have lightweight adapters but can weigh almost as much as a full-size notebook if you have to carry their external optical and floppy drives.When you return to your desk, you can snap most notebooks onto an extra-cost docking station or port replicator (prices range from $100 to $500). This saves you from repeatedly having to plug in and unplug an external monitor, keyboard, mouse, and other desktop peripherals.Communications

Few notebooks come with a full set of legacy ports anymore. Serial ports are rare, and PS/2 ports (for a mouse or keyboard) and infrared ports are going the way of the dodo, as well. Most notebooks still have a parallel port and one PC Card slot, though many now also offer an ExpressCard slot. Quite a few full-size models now include a DVI port for connecting to an external digital display.Most notebooks have at least two USB 2.0 ports; many now offer four, and some even offer up to six. A majority of notebooks include a FireWire (IEEE 1394) port for connecting an external drive, an MP3 player, or a digital-video camcorder.Built-in ethernet now comes standard on all portables, with many models including gigabit ethernet. Notebooks using the Intel Centrino processor include Intel's 802.11b/g networking built in; those using AMD's processors have the option of 802.11b/g. Bluetooth is also catching on, but unless you have a specific need for it, don't splurge for built-in Bluetooth.A smattering of notebooks now include built in wireless broadband wide-area networking, enabling them to access Verizon Wireless's EV-DO BroadbandAccess service, for example.Most notebooks include one or more card slots for removable media such as CompactFlash, Secure Digital, MultiMediaCard, Memory Stick, or Smart Media.


The Specs ExplainedBefore shopping for a notebook, consider how you'll be using it. If your primary goal is to get some word processing or spreadsheet work done while staying on top of e-mail, a $1000 Core Duo model with a 14.1-inch screen and 40GB hard drive will be plenty fast and will save you hundreds of dollars. Sexy lightweight notebooks and models with top-notch processing power and big screens cost much more.Keep in mind, however, that most vendors let you custom-build and price your notebook by picking from a mind-boggling array of features. This gives you a lot of control over the final product. You may be able to afford a faster notebook by accepting a smaller, less expensive hard drive or DVD-ROM/CD-RW drive instead of a Double Layer DVD+/-RW SuperMulti driver.Unlike with desktop PCs, you can later upgrade only some of these components, such as memory and the hard drive; items such as the graphics board are permanent once they're installed at the factory. That state of affairs is slowly changing, as some manufacturers incorporate upgradable graphics. But take your time and pick only what you need. Below is a rough breakout of some configuration options.Important consideration: Installed memoryThe more installed memory your notebook has, the more applications you can run at once, and the better your notebook will perform. Ease of access aside, upgrading memory in a notebook is a bit trickier than in a desktop, so buy as much memory preinstalled as you can afford. Notebooks with 512MB or 1GB of RAM are optimal.Important consideration: processor. The CPU determines how quickly a notebook runs applications and performs on-screen tasks. Core Duo and Core 2 Duo processors are good choices for speedy processing. (Check latest prices for recommended notebooks.)Important consideration: Screen sizeThe size of a notebook's LCD screen is quoted as a diagonal measurement. The larger the screen, the higher the maximum resolution and the more information you can view at once. At this point, most notebooks are wide-screen models; if you want a notebook with a standard-aspect screen you'll have to search a bit, but they are still available. (Compare notebooks with recommended screen sizes.)Somewhat important: Hard-drive sizeThe larger the hard drive is, the more data you can keep on your notebook. Most people don't need more than 80GB. If you work with databases, spreadsheets, or digital photo or video files, however, you should opt for a large drive.Somewhat important: Expansion baysThe more expansion bays the manufacturer includes, the more options you'll have to switch in new optical drives or other storage drives; but switching drives takes time. Be aware that high-end ultraportables typically have no extra bays, though you can purchase external drives for them.Somewhat important: Optical drivesMost manufacturers offer laptops with rewritable DVD drives, which give you the greatest flexibility. To save money, you can purchase a notebook with a DVD-ROM/CD-RW drive.


Notebook Shopping TipsAre you ready to buy a notebook? Here are PC World's recommendations for specifications that will fit the needs of the average user.A 1.73-GHz Pentium M processorFor everyday work--word processing, spreadsheets, e-mail--you don't need the latest, greatest (read most expensive) Pentium processor, but thankfully, with the Pentium M, you get smooth performance and long battery life. (Check latest prices.)512MB of memory or moreAnything less will slow your work. (Check latest prices for notebooks with 512MB of memory or more.)Supplemental batteryThey usually last longer on one charge than nickel-metal hydride batteries and don't need to be replaced as often. If you want more time away from an outlet, buy a notebook with a modular bay capable of holding a supplementary power pack. Secondary batteries usually cost between $99 and $200.A 14.1-inch wide-screenA screen larger than 12.1 inches eases eyestrain. Unless you're really pinching pennies, bigger is better. (Compare prices for notebooks with 14.1-inch screens.)A 60GB hard driveUnless you generate multimegabyte music or database files, or install more than one office suite, 60GB is plenty big.Touchpad pointing devicePointing devices are a matter of taste. However, most people find a touchpad easier to use than a pointing stick. For people who can't choose between a touchpad and an eraserhead pointing device, some notebooks include both. If you buy one of these, make sure it provides two sets of mouse buttons--one for the touchpad and the other for the eraserhead--so you don't have to stretch to reach.Multiple USB portsMany notebooks now come with two or more USB 2.0 ports, useful for connecting more of the latest peripherals.All-in-one designUnless you need a lightweight notebook, opt for one with an internal bay for both the optical drive. This design enables you to swap in other devices, such as an extra hard drive or second battery.

Content by:

Read More......

Top five all-purpose laptops


Top 5 All-Purpose Laptops



These laptops can do it all and are a great choice for most notebook users. Ratings and rankings can change due to pricing and technology changes, so check back frequently for the latest info.Edited by Kalpana Ettenson


Edited by Kalpana Ettenson


  1. Dell Inspiron E1505
    Bottom Line: With "instant office apps" capability and fast performance, the E1505 is a good all-around notebook for getting work done.
    PC World Rating: 83 (Very Good)
    CPU: 2-GHz Core 2 Duo T7200
    Display Size (inches): 15.4
    Wide Screen: Yes
    Total HD Size (GB): 120
    Min. Weight (lbs.): 6.9
    Price When Reviewed: $1139
    Rated on: February 06, 2007

  2. Lenovo ThinkPad R60
    Bottom Line: Providing long battery life but a staid design, the R60 overall is a solid choice for mainstream users on a budget.
    PC World Rating: 80 (Very Good)
    CPU: 2-GHz Core Duo T2500
    Display Size (inches): 15
    Wide Screen: No
    Total HD Size (GB): 100
    Min. Weight (lbs.): 6.8
    Price When Reviewed: $1299
    Rated on: February 06, 2007

  3. Lenovo 3000 C100
    Bottom Line: This affordable notebook has a basic design but long battery life and fairly robust features for the price.
    PC World Rating: 80 (Very Good)
    CPU: 1.73-GHz Pentium M 740
    Display Size (inches): 15
    Wide Screen: No
    Total HD Size (GB): 80
    Min. Weight (lbs.): 6.3
    Price When Reviewed: $873
    Rated on: February 06, 2007

  4. HP Pavilion dv2000t
    Bottom Line: Offering stunning looks and great battery life, the dv2000t is an excellent home and small-business notebook.
    PC World Rating: 79 (Good)
    CPU: 2.16-GHz Core Duo T2600
    Display Size (inches): 14.1
    Wide Screen: Yes
    Total HD Size (GB): 120
    Min. Weight (lbs.): 6.1
    Price When Reviewed: $1570
    Rated on: February 06, 2007

  5. Sony VAIO VGN-N170G
    Bottom Line: This inexpensive, stylish notebook has modest processing power but lacks a user-upgradable hard drive.
    PC World Rating: 77 (Good)
    CPU: 1.6-GHz Core Duo T2050
    Display Size (inches): 15.4
    Wide Screen: Yes
    Total HD Size (GB): 100
    Min. Weight (lbs.): 6.7
    Price When Reviewed: $1100
    Rated on: February 06, 2007
Content by:





Related Tech & Gadgets Articles

Read More......

Top 10 Value Desktop PCs


Top 10 Value Desktop PCs

These well-priced desktop PCs are well equipped to handle the tasks most people need to perform. Ratings and rankings can change due to pricing and technology changes, so check back frequently for the latest info.

Edited by Kalpana Ettenson


  1. Micro Express MicroFlex 66B
    Bottom Line: System outperformed our other value models by a wide margin; it?s a great choice for media editing or gaming.
    PC World Rating: 83 (Very Good)
    CPU: 2.4-GHz Core 2 Duo E6600
    Graphics Adapter: ATI Radeon X1600
    Monitor Model: ViewSonic VP720b
    Total HD Size (GB): 250
    Case Type: Midsize tower
    Price When Reviewed: $999
    Rated on: January 09, 2007


  2. Dell Dimension C521
    Bottom Line: The inexpensive C521 is a solid performer; its compact design makes it a great fit for tight spaces.
    PC World Rating: 75 (Good)
    CPU: 2-GHz Athlon 64 X2 3800+
    Graphics Adapter: ATI Radeon X1300
    Monitor Model: Dell E177FP
    Total HD Size (GB): 160
    Case Type: Minitower
    Price When Reviewed: $729
    Rated on: January 09, 2007


  3. Dell Dimension E520
    Bottom Line: Midpriced Windows Media Center PC has strong performance and solid features for the price.
    PC World Rating: 74 (Good)
    CPU: 1.86-GHz Core 2 Duo E6300
    Graphics Adapter: nVidia GeForce 6150 LE
    Monitor Model: Dell E177FP
    Total HD Size (GB): 250
    Case Type: Midsize tower
    Price When Reviewed: $989
    Rated on: January 09, 2007


  4. CyberPower Gamer Ultra 7500SE
    Bottom Line: A gaming system for buyers on a budget, this model provides fairly good performance at a very attractive price.
    PC World Rating: 73 (Good)
    CPU: 2-GHz Athlon 64 X2 3800+
    Graphics Adapter: eVGA e-GeForce 7600GS
    Monitor Model: Optiquest Q9
    Total HD Size (GB): 250
    Case Type: Midsize tower
    Price When Reviewed: $999
    Rated on: January 09, 2007


  5. HP Media Center TV m7690y
    Bottom Line: Media-centric system performed very well for a value PC; with its TV tuner, it could replace your living-room DVR.
    PC World Rating: 73 (Good)
    CPU: 1.86-GHz Core 2 Duo E6300
    Graphics Adapter: nVidia GeForce 7300LE
    Monitor Model: HP vs19
    Total HD Size (GB): 160
    Case Type: Midsize tower
    Price When Reviewed: $1000
    Rated on: January 09, 2007


  6. Dell Dimension E521
    Bottom Line: Cheap PC came bundled with a good 17-inch LCD monitor, but its low performance matches its low price.
    PC World Rating: 72 (Good)
    CPU: 1.8-GHz Sempron 3400+
    Graphics Adapter: nVidia GeForce 7300 LE
    Monitor Model: Dell E177FP
    Total HD Size (GB): 80
    Case Type: Midsize tower
    Price When Reviewed: $489
    Rated on: January 09, 2007


  7. Systemax Vitality DH463
    Bottom Line: The Vitality is a strong performer and offers lots of room for upgrades.
    PC World Rating: 72 (Good)
    CPU: 1.86-GHz Core 2 Duo E6300
    Graphics Adapter: ATI Radeon X1600 Pro
    Monitor Model: Hanns G
    Total HD Size (GB): 250
    Case Type: Midsize tower
    Price When Reviewed: $1199
    Rated on: January 09, 2007


  8. Lenovo ThinkCentre A60 D3U
    Bottom Line: Solid business system includes innovative features such as a data encryption chip and remote management.
    PC World Rating: 71 (Good)
    CPU: 2.2-GHz Athlon 64 X2 4200+
    Graphics Adapter: nVidia GeForce 6100
    Monitor Model: Lenovo L192p Wide
    Total HD Size (GB): 160
    Case Type: Minitower
    Price When Reviewed: $949
    Rated on: January 09, 2007


  9. eMachines T5048
    Bottom Line: Inexpensive system contains low-end components that delivered lackluster performance.
    PC World Rating: 71 (Good)
    CPU: 3.06-GHz Pentium 4 524
    Graphics Adapter: ATI Radeon Xpress 200
    Monitor Model: eMachines eView 17F3
    Total HD Size (GB): 160
    Case Type: Minitower
    Price When Reviewed: $600
    Rated on: January 09, 2007


  10. Polywell MiniBox 939NP-4200
    Bottom Line: Compact box-shaped model turned in great performance but offers little expansion room in its cramped interior.
    PC World Rating: 70 (Good)
    CPU: 2.2-GHz Athlon 64 X2 4200+
    Graphics Adapter: eVGA e-GeForce 7600GS
    Monitor Model: Avidav M1931
    Total HD Size (GB): 320
    Case Type: Compact
    Price When Reviewed: $1250
    Rated on: January 09, 2007

Content by:



CONTINUED: Top 10 Value Desktop PCs

Read More......

First Look: New Ways to Watch Movies on Your PC

First Look: New Ways to Watch Movies on Your PC
By Liane Cassavoy, PC World
Netflix streaming-movie service is free for subscribers but limited in selection; with Wal-Mart's beta service, some playback problems mar the experience.
Remember the days when you had to drive to a store to rent a movie? Two new services--one from Netflix, the king of online DVD rentals, and the other from Wal-Mart, the king of retail--are hoping to make that a faint memory.
If you're a Netflix subscriber, the company's new Instant Movie Watching feature lets you watch streaming movies on your PC without waiting for a DVD to arrive in the mail--or for a movie to download. Wal-Mart's Video Downloads store, meanwhile, allows anyone to purchase and download flicks for watching on a PC or a portable device. Both services offer a handy and legal way to watch movies on your PC, but both have a few wrinkles to iron out.
Instant Movie Watching will be available to all Netflix subscribers by June; right now it is rolling out to approximately 1 million users per month. Instead of downloads, it provides streamed versions of movies and TV shows. It will be included with all Netflix subscriptions, which range in price from $5 to $48 per month, for no additional fee. Users are allotted an amount of Instant Watching hours each month, corresponding to the monthly fee for their account. If you subscribe to the $15-per-month service, for example, you're allotted 15 hours of instant movie watching each month. Whether you use the feature or not, you will continue to receive your regular Netflix DVDs in the mail.
Wal-Mart's service, currently widely available in beta, follows the iTunes Music Store model: It offers movies and TV shows for download and purchase for between $1.96 and $14.88. Once you buy a video, you own it. You can play it on the PC that you used to purchase it, or transfer it to as many as three portable devices. You can also burn it to a CD or DVD for backup, but Wal-Mart says that the disc will play only on the PC that you used to buy the video.
Both services allow you to scan available titles online, read brief synopses of the movies or shows, and watch previews. Netflix says its service currently has 1000 titles for instant viewing but will offer 5000 by the end of the year. This modest quantity of available titles is the service's biggest downfall; scanning through the selection, I saw only a handful of movies from 2006, and of those I recognized few of the titles. Netflix attributes its limited offerings to the reluctance of movie studios to release titles for electronic distribution, but Wal-Mart's service has a much better selection. Though you won't be overwhelmed by the number of movies available for download there--the online store currently offers more than 3000 titles--you will see newer titles, such as The Departed, The Devil Wears Prada, and Little Miss Sunshine.
Let the Movies PlayBoth services run on the Windows Media Player platform, but you must download software (even if you already have WMP installed) before you can begin watching or downloading movies. Netflix requires that you use its own Movie Player, which runs right in your browser window. You're prompted to download the app when you select a title to watch. The download is quick and installation is easy; within just a few minutes, my selected movie was playing. The Wal-Mart Video Downloader, which manages your downloads and your video collection, also serves as the player for your files. Downloading and installing this app wasn't as easy; the process required several reboots, and I had to initiate the installation twice before it took. Such hiccups could be due to the beta status of the service, however.
With Netflix Instant Movie Watching, you must be connected to the Internet to watch a movie. The site measures the speed of your Internet connection to determine your likely video quality; I found that the quality varied greatly depending on both my connection speed and whether I viewed the video in a partial-screen or full-screen format. Even when I viewed the video in the smaller format, the quality never matched that of a DVD; the video was often blurry, and I noticed occasional pixelation. You can stop watching a movie and resume watching later, but the service does not remember where you left off if you've closed that browser window. Though you can pause, fast-forward, and rewind video, the movies don't include any DVD formatting--such as chapters--for jumping through the content.
The speed of your Internet connection, as well as the format you choose, will determine how long downloading a movie from Wal-Mart's store will take. You can download a movie in a portable format, which is compressed for transfer to any PlaysForSure 2.0 portable device, or in a standard format, which is a larger file designed for playing on your PC. A 1-hour, 45-minute portable-format movie that I tried was only 536MB and downloaded to my PC in less than 25 minutes. In standard format, a 2-hour movie can be more than 1GB, and in my tests such files took anywhere from 30 minutes to more than an hour to download.
I also ran into problems getting my movies to play after they downloaded. You initiate the playback from within the Wal-Mart Movie Downloader app, which lists all of your available titles. When I tried to play Running With Scissors, I was repeatedly told that I did not have the rights to do so, even though I had just downloaded and purchased it. Wal-Mart's customer service reps were unable to solve the problem, even after walking me through repeated downloads and updates of all my WMP components, and I never could watch the movie. I had a similar issue with another title that I downloaded on another PC: Every time I tried to play the movie, I saw the same error message. But on that PC, after I clicked Play four times, the error message disappeared and the movie started. These difficulties may be due to the fact that the service is in beta, but they still hampered my ability to watch and enjoy movies--and those movies cost money.
Overall, Netflix Instant Movie Watching offered a smoother experience. The service is severely held back by its limited array of titles, but I like that it's included with an existing Netflix membership. Wal-Mart Video Downloads lets you watch your videos offline, and has a much better movie selection. If you can't get a movie to play, though, the title selection doesn't mean a whole lot.
Netflix Instant Movie WatchingPC World Rating:80This service offers an easy way for subscribers to watch movies on their PCs, but its selection of titles is meager.Price when reviewed: Free with Netflix subscription ($5 to $48 per month)http://www.netflix.com/
Wal-Mart Video DownloadsPC World Rating:75Though Wal-Mart's beta service provides an impressive movie selection, playback problems mar the experience.Price when reviewed: $1.96 to $14.88 per download mediadownloads.walmart.com

Content by:

Read More......

PC makers walk fine line with crapware NO.2

PC makers walk fine line with 'crapware'
(continued) NO.2

Plus, Bhavnani said, Apple systems sell for far more than the average PC. "They make more money on the box than (Hewlett-Packard) or Dell does," he said. "That's why they are able to do that."Ultimately, consumers are going to have to decide whether it is worth paying more to get their new computers clutter-free. The addition of trial software and other offers, along with falling component prices, is what has made PCs so cheap."One of the reasons is, they are being basically subsidized with billboards," Bhavnani said. "It would be like driving around in a car that you save 10 percent on, but with a big Google sticker on it."There was some thought that the debut of Microsoft's Windows Vista might have shaken things up a bit. On the one hand, there were concerns that PC makers wouldn't have time to test all their programs and that they might ship software that didn't even work with the new operating system.Others thought that with Windows Vista adding more features, such as DVD burning and desktop search, there might be less of a need for add-ons. In the end, though, most computer makers are shipping about as much extra software as they did with XP.Gateway said it is shipping roughly the same amount of preloaded software on its Windows Vista machines as it did with the prior operating system.HP, meanwhile said it took the opportunity of Windows Vista's debut to rethink its software bundles and pare things down a bit. "The exact answer varies country by country, but most customers will find we are shipping fewer software titles with our Vista PCs," an HP representative said.Dell said it has started letting customers have more say about which programs are loaded onto its systems. It says that in many cases, consumers are choosing the free programs, including trial software."I think that speaks volumes for the fact that, despite a large discussion around 'bloatware' and that all this stuff is garbage...there are a fair number of people out there that see value and want this on their system," said Jeremy Friedlander, the senior manager for the software that goes on new Dell PCs.For retail customers, there is less ability to change what's in the box, but shopping around can help. A recent stroll through a CompUSA in San Francisco showed just how widely the systems varied. At one end of the extreme were notebooks from Acer that didn't have much more than a Yahoo toolbar, two disc-burning utilities and Norton security software from Symantec.On the other hand, Sony crammed several of its laptops with an array of software, including dozens of software trials, special offers and links to Internet services. The desktop is filled with several icons for AOL, as part of Sony's broad agreement with that company. Sony also loads four full-length movies onto the hard drives of many models, but it charges users who want to watch any of the flicks.Even its tiny 4.5-inch UX series handheld Windows machine is packed full of trial software.Much of the software just isn't useful, NPD's Baker said, noting that high-end laptops are still being sold with trials for dial-up Internet access, something very unlikely to be needed, or for services no longer really needed by today's PC user."The way it's designed right now is guaranteed to make it crapware," he said.One of the biggest offenses, Bhavnani said, is when companies load multiple, competing products. In particular, dueling security programs can be hard for the average user to sort out."That's where it gets really confusing," Bhavnani said. "You have no idea which one is which and what to do."

Content by:

Read More......

PC makers walk fine line with 'crapware'


PC makers walk fine line with 'crapware'
By Ina Fried, Staff Writer, CNET News.com

For years, computer makers have managed to wring a few extra bucks of profit out of each PC sale by bundling all sorts of third-party software.While adding software, setting default search engines and including toolbars can all put money in PC makers' pockets, the practice has also alienated some consumers who say all such "crapware" is clogging their hard drives and bogging down their systems.For the moment, computer makers appear to be trying to walk a fine line, tweaking their approaches slightly but hoping not to have to slay a cash cow. Gateway, for example, offers only one program in each category, while Dell has added an option for some models that allow a user to configure a system with no trial software."We've seen the evolution," IDC analyst Richard Shim said. "The desktop became kind of a billboard for Internet service providers and software. Now the pendulum is swinging the other way."______________________________________________________________Sound Off: Would you pay more for a 'crapware-free' PC?______________________________________________________________At one time, PC makers thought they might be able to subsidize the whole cost of a PC through a combination of advertising and bounties from signing up ISP customers.While those dreams have largely faded, companies have continued to make money from including trial software, desktop icons and more recently, by agreeing to include a toolbar or other service from the leading Internet search providers.Despite some outcry from consumers, there's still plenty of software being loaded on new machines. In part, that's because the PC industry needs the cash that such deals offer. Even if the companies get less than $1 per software program that they include on a PC, that can still add up to $10 or $20 in revenue."On a $400 PC, that's a big thing to get," said Stephen Baker, an analyst at The NPD Group.In one sense, such bundled software represents free money for the PC industry. But at the same time, if it adds up to support headaches or causes customers to shy away, such software may not be worth adding.Samir Bhavnani, an analyst at market researcher Current Analysis, said one option computer makers should consider is letting buyers order a software-free system but charge a premium to make up for the lost revenue. Bhavnani figures an extra $25 should be enough to cover the company's shortfall."It would be so simple for them to come out with an anticrapware PC," Bhavnani said. "People would love them for it. The question is, who has the (guts) to do it?"Apple, for its part, is playing off the growing outcry, highlighted in a recent column by Walt Mossberg in The Wall Street Journal. In a new ad that debuted this week, the "PC guy" played by John Hodgman appears so bloated he can barely move."It's all this trial software," Hodgman says in the spot. "They pack my hard drive full of it, all these programs that don't do very much, unless you buy the whole thing...it really slows me down."For the record, Macs do come with trial versions of Microsoft Office and Apple's iWork, though all other included applications are full versions of programs, including the company's iPhoto and iMovie, as well as third-party titles such as Comic Life.

Please continue next page

Read More......

GeekTech: Ailing PC? Buy a New One!

GeekTech: Ailing PC? Buy a New One!
Tom Mainelli
In an age of disposable computers, sometimes it's easier, and cheaper, to buy new rather than repair old.
During a recent trip back to the Midwest to visit friends and family, I had a side job to accomplish: resuscitate my sister's comotose desktop PC.
It was one of those deals where the PC worked one day, and then the next it just didn't. It wouldn't boot. Heck, it wouldn't even turn on. She confirmed that all cables and power cords were plugged in. And she swore she hadn't poured a Coke into the system's innards.
Hmmmm. Well, I was out of ideas. Okay, not really. Before the trip I attempted to do some preliminary remote troubleshooting, with my Dad's help. I asked him to open the case and look to see if a green light was glowing on the motherboard (a task my sister wasn't comfortable doing). If that light was off, I reasoned, then maybe the power supply was dead. That's a simple enough fix, I thought. Unfortunately, the light was on.
"What about the power button?" I asked, definitely reaching a bit. He pushed the button. "It feels a little spongy," he said. And he would know, because he has the exact same eMachines system at home, purchased the same day, at the same store, two years earlier.
"Aha," I thought. "The whole PC is dead because one cheapo little part--the power button--stopped working."
Yeah, I knew that was probably just wishfully simplistic thinking (is it ever that easy?). But a guy has to hope, right?
The Trip HomeOne of the special things about this trip home was that, after more than 35 years in the same house in Omaha, Nebraska, my folks had just moved into the country home of their dreams. They'd been looking for a new place for so long I thought it was just a hobby, until they found a beautiful place about 30 miles away, just outside of Minden, Iowa, and bought it. This would be our first stay at the new house.
Life in the country can be peaceful and relaxing. One downside, however, is the complete lack of local computer parts stores. The nearest CompUSA is about an hour away from my parents' house, and the closest Fry's Electronics (a favorite superstore of many San Francisco Bay Area geeks like me) is, oh, like a thousand miles. My sister still lives in Omaha, but my Dad insisted I wasn't going to spend a day of my vacation there running back and forth to the store and trying to fix her PC, and I sort of agreed with that logic. So he transported the PC to their new house for me to try my one idea for a fix. I bought a new chassis with a power supply in Omaha before heading out to Minden, and figured I'd have the old eMachine purring away in its new body in no time.
An Unsuccessful TransplantI was wrong. Despite what appeared to be a successful transplant, the PC wouldn't boot in the new chassis, either. Clearly it wasn't the power button. More likely, it was the motherboard. My inclination was to replace the motherboard, but I didn't have one on me. Driving back to Omaha to get one wasn't a great option; and my stay wasn't long enough to wait for NewEgg to deliver--and paying overnight shipping on a cheapo motherboard seemed downright silly.
It's probably a good thing there wasn't a Fry's down the street, because the more I thought about it, the less sense it made to rebuild this PC. For one thing, my sister didn't have any must-save documents on the hard drive, and she didn't need the PC immediately for business use. Second, it was an ultra-low-end system when she bought it, and two years later the assorted components I was trying to salvage weren't exactly setting the world on fire.
Plus, if I installed a new motherboard I was fairly certain I wouldn't be able to use the eMachines restore disc, which meant I would need a Windows XP disc (and even I don't travel with one of those). And what if the problem turned out to be not the motherboard, but the processor or the RAM? Before long this little fix-it job could end up getting pretty pricey.
I declared the patient dead on the table, and urged my sister to move on.



Cheap, Cheap, CheapMy sister isn't interested in computing power. She has no interest in playing PC games. She doesn't really use the PC for anything but Web surfing, CD ripping, and the occasional check on Web-based e-mail (which she'd been accessing at work since her own PC died). She essentially had one requirement of her new PC: that it be cheap.
I was around when my parents and sister bought their eMachines two years earlier, and was amazed at how much PC they managed to get for $450. Today you can get even more, for substantially less--if you shop carefully.
I started off looking at Dell's Web site, where at first glance it appeared you could get a bare-bones, low-end Dimension PC for less than $300 (sans monitor). But that price applied only before you upgraded to enough RAM to actually run Windows XP well, increased the hard drive to a reasonable size, and then paid to have it shipped out. It's worth noting that Dell's price did include recycling your old PC, something my sister will have to deal with on her own.
That's because we found her next PC the way I suspect a lot of people find their computers: in the Sunday newspaper circulars. At Best Buy, to be precise. For just $350 (and no rebate nonsense) the store offered an HP Compaq Presario Media Center SR1910NX system with an AMD Sempron 3200+ processor, 512MB of memory, a 120GB hard drive, a DVD/CD-RW combo drive, nVidia 6150LE integrated graphics, and a 17-inch CRT. True, it wouldn't break any land-speed records, but it would do.
For an extra $100 you could even upgrade to an Athlon 64 3500+ CPU, a 200GB hard drive, a LightScribe DVD-RW drive, and a nine-in-one media card reader. That's a lot more computer for the extra dough, but, of course, she wouldn't hear of it.
My sister picked up her new PC in Omaha less than a week later. By that time I was back home in Northern California. She did call me during the setup, but not because she had problems plugging in the cables and booting the system (the PC companies have finally figured that out with clever color coding). She called with a question about Symantec Norton Internet Security.
A week later she phoned again to let me know that she was really enjoying her new PC. But she had one more question: How come she couldn't upload the more than 2000 songs on her iPod (ripped from her own CDs using her now-dead eMachine) to her new PC?
"Oh, that's a digital rights management issue," I said. "And that's WAY more complicated than a dead PC."

Content by:

Read More......

First Look: New Ways to Watch Movies on Your PC

First Look: New Ways to Watch Movies on Your PC
By Liane Cassavoy, PC World

Netflix streaming-movie service is free for subscribers but limited in selection; with Wal-Mart's beta service, some playback problems mar the experience.
Remember the days when you had to drive to a store to rent a movie? Two new services--one from Netflix, the king of online DVD rentals, and the other from Wal-Mart, the king of retail--are hoping to make that a faint memory.
If you're a Netflix subscriber, the company's new Instant Movie Watching feature lets you watch streaming movies on your PC without waiting for a DVD to arrive in the mail--or for a movie to download. Wal-Mart's Video Downloads store, meanwhile, allows anyone to purchase and download flicks for watching on a PC or a portable device. Both services offer a handy and legal way to watch movies on your PC, but both have a few wrinkles to iron out.
Instant Movie Watching will be available to all Netflix subscribers by June; right now it is rolling out to approximately 1 million users per month. Instead of downloads, it provides streamed versions of movies and TV shows. It will be included with all Netflix subscriptions, which range in price from $5 to $48 per month, for no additional fee. Users are allotted an amount of Instant Watching hours each month, corresponding to the monthly fee for their account. If you subscribe to the $15-per-month service, for example, you're allotted 15 hours of instant movie watching each month. Whether you use the feature or not, you will continue to receive your regular Netflix DVDs in the mail.
Wal-Mart's service, currently widely available in beta, follows the iTunes Music Store model: It offers movies and TV shows for download and purchase for between $1.96 and $14.88. Once you buy a video, you own it. You can play it on the PC that you used to purchase it, or transfer it to as many as three portable devices. You can also burn it to a CD or DVD for backup, but Wal-Mart says that the disc will play only on the PC that you used to buy the video.
Both services allow you to scan available titles online, read brief synopses of the movies or shows, and watch previews. Netflix says its service currently has 1000 titles for instant viewing but will offer 5000 by the end of the year. This modest quantity of available titles is the service's biggest downfall; scanning through the selection, I saw only a handful of movies from 2006, and of those I recognized few of the titles. Netflix attributes its limited offerings to the reluctance of movie studios to release titles for electronic distribution, but Wal-Mart's service has a much better selection. Though you won't be overwhelmed by the number of movies available for download there--the online store currently offers more than 3000 titles--you will see newer titles, such as The Departed, The Devil Wears Prada, and Little Miss Sunshine.
Let the Movies PlayBoth services run on the Windows Media Player platform, but you must download software (even if you already have WMP installed) before you can begin watching or downloading movies. Netflix requires that you use its own Movie Player, which runs right in your browser window. You're prompted to download the app when you select a title to watch. The download is quick and installation is easy; within just a few minutes, my selected movie was playing. The Wal-Mart Video Downloader, which manages your downloads and your video collection, also serves as the player for your files. Downloading and installing this app wasn't as easy; the process required several reboots, and I had to initiate the installation twice before it took. Such hiccups could be due to the beta status of the service, however.
With Netflix Instant Movie Watching, you must be connected to the Internet to watch a movie. The site measures the speed of your Internet connection to determine your likely video quality; I found that the quality varied greatly depending on both my connection speed and whether I viewed the video in a partial-screen or full-screen format. Even when I viewed the video in the smaller format, the quality never matched that of a DVD; the video was often blurry, and I noticed occasional pixelation. You can stop watching a movie and resume watching later, but the service does not remember where you left off if you've closed that browser window. Though you can pause, fast-forward, and rewind video, the movies don't include any DVD formatting--such as chapters--for jumping through the content.
The speed of your Internet connection, as well as the format you choose, will determine how long downloading a movie from Wal-Mart's store will take. You can download a movie in a portable format, which is compressed for transfer to any PlaysForSure 2.0 portable device, or in a standard format, which is a larger file designed for playing on your PC. A 1-hour, 45-minute portable-format movie that I tried was only 536MB and downloaded to my PC in less than 25 minutes. In standard format, a 2-hour movie can be more than 1GB, and in my tests such files took anywhere from 30 minutes to more than an hour to download.
I also ran into problems getting my movies to play after they downloaded. You initiate the playback from within the Wal-Mart Movie Downloader app, which lists all of your available titles. When I tried to play Running With Scissors, I was repeatedly told that I did not have the rights to do so, even though I had just downloaded and purchased it. Wal-Mart's customer service reps were unable to solve the problem, even after walking me through repeated downloads and updates of all my WMP components, and I never could watch the movie. I had a similar issue with another title that I downloaded on another PC: Every time I tried to play the movie, I saw the same error message. But on that PC, after I clicked Play four times, the error message disappeared and the movie started. These difficulties may be due to the fact that the service is in beta, but they still hampered my ability to watch and enjoy movies--and those movies cost money.
Overall, Netflix Instant Movie Watching offered a smoother experience. The service is severely held back by its limited array of titles, but I like that it's included with an existing Netflix membership. Wal-Mart Video Downloads lets you watch your videos offline, and has a much better movie selection. If you can't get a movie to play, though, the title selection doesn't mean a whole lot.
Netflix Instant Movie WatchingPC World Rating:80This service offers an easy way for subscribers to watch movies on their PCs, but its selection of titles is meager.Price when reviewed: Free with Netflix subscription ($5 to $48 per month)http://www.netflix.com/
Wal-Mart Video DownloadsPC World Rating:75Though Wal-Mart's beta service provides an impressive movie selection, playback problems mar the experience.Price when reviewed: $1.96 to $14.88 per download mediadownloads.walmart.com


Content by:

Read More......

The Future of Your PC NO.3

The Future of Your PC
(continued)


Speed BarriersOf course, such performance advances will have to be achieved within realistic parameters. Intel's single-core CPUs experienced increasingly serious power-consumption and heat problems, speeding the demise of that architecture. Smaller, more efficient cores will continue to provide a better overall power profile than a single megachip. That's certainly positive news for notebooks, which have historically lagged behind desktop machines in performance due to heat and power constraints.AMD chief technical officer Phil Hester notes that mobility will be a major driver for the company over the next several years, and that the company's acquisition of graphics purveyor ATI will be key to this strategy. "In the 1980s, the 286 and 386 had math coprocessors separate. Eventually that was integrated into the CPU. The same thing will happen to 3D graphics...in the post-Vista time frame," he says. According to Hester, we can also expect that power management will be improved to the point where someday a device the size of a PDA should be capable of producing a PC-caliber graphics experience.The major stumbling blocks to more powerful computers, says Bautista, are elsewhere on the motherboard: Memory bandwidth must grow dramatically to keep up with the CPU, and even hard-disk input/output will have to handle faster data transfers. If you want more-realistic online gaming, "even your broadband connection may need to scale," says Bautista.And what of Moore's Law, which states that the number of transistors on a chip doubles every 18 months (along with CPU processing power)? "It's still alive and well," says Bautista. He also thinks that parallel processing, which splits a workload among many cores, makes it more likely to continue. "Multiple, smaller cores are easier to build, and there's no end in sight as the manufacturing process continues to shrink. All the stars are aligned right now," he says.
LCDs: Bigger, Brighter, and Priced to MoveBy year's end, wide screens will be on 10 to 12 percent of desktops, with up to 20 percent share by the end of 2007, according to Chris Connery, vice president of market research for analysis firm DisplaySearch.The other big trend: bigger, brighter, and cheaper LCDs. Rhoda Alexander, director of monitor research at iSuppli, says that 78 percent of monitors were 17 inches or smaller in 2005, but she projects that by 2010 less than 20 percent of monitors will be that small. Resolution will improve as screens grow: Though only 4 percent of today's monitors feature resolution higher than SXGA (1280 by 1024), Alexander says that figure will grow to 23 percent by 2010.Screens 25 inches and larger should also become common, says Connery. In addition, thanks to LED backlights (which are hitting the market now only in superpremium displays), buyers who are willing to pay a little extra will have a brighter monitor that displays colors more accurately.What about emerging technologies like organic LED (OLED) and liquid crystal on silicon (LCoS)? Both will find homes in certain niches--OLED on tiny displays like those of MP3 players and cameras, and LCoS on projector TVs--but neither is likely to make a dent on the desktop. Expect LCD products to rule for at least the next five years because of their availability and affordability.Flexible displays that can be bent or rolled, as well as electronic-ink products (see our hands-on look at Sony's Reader), will also find a piece of the market, starting in areas like grocery-store shelf price tags that can be instantly and easily updated.Touch screens will also likely become more popular for niche uses. NYU researcher Jeff Han demonstrated an impressive advancement of the technology earlier this year, in the form of a multi-touch-screen, partially gesture-based interface.
Graphics: Not Just for GamersThere's no end in sight to the PC's increasing hunger for more graphical power. As nVidia chief scientist David Kirk says, "We're years and years away from being able to do everything we'd like to be able to do."GPU manufacturers are busy preparing for DirectX 10 and its promised 8X performance improvement over DirectX 9. Expect nVidia and ATI to transition to GPUs that use unified shader architectures featuring general-purpose pipelines that can process pixels, geometry, or even physics code. Future GPUs will pile on more and more of these pipelines, enabling some truly amazing effects. Dedicated physics cards (like the Ageia PhysX accelerator), which supplement your regular graphics board, may also become more prevalent. The market will soon decide whether the GPU or a secondary processor is the best way to handle physics processing.Products like the nVidia Quadro Plex may also be a sign of the way the market is headed: The $17,000-plus device is an external graphics system that can perform up to 80 billion calculations per second, about ten times what today's top high-powered PC graphics cards can manage. Experts believe that the next generation of cards could consume up to a blazing 200 watts of power and require external components.Another emerging graphics technology, general-purpose GPU, uses the custom computing capabilities of a graphics card in a nongaming environment. Adobe has been using GPGPU for functions such as video transitions in some form since 1995.
Storage: Terabytes and BeyondHitachi senior VP Bill Healy says that if current trends hold, by 2025 a standard 3.5-inch hard drive (if any manufacturer still bothered to make models in that format) could contain up to 20 terabytes of data.Driving the immediate surge of capacity is perpendicular magnetic recording technology, which overcomes the limitations of traditional longitudinal magnetic recording and packs much more data into a far smaller physical area. The first hard drives using PMR reached market last year. Seagate's chief technology officer, Mark Kryder, informed us that all of his company's upcoming hard drives will employ it.Heat-assisted magnetic recording (HAMR), which allows platters to be made from materials that can support a denser number of bits, is expected early next decade. Even more of a long shot is patterned media, which forgoes a uniform layer in favor of "islands" of material that do not physically touch each other.The future of optical storage is far less certain. The current battle between Blu-ray Disc and HD DVD, two competing and incompatible blue-laser formats, has no clear winner in sight. "As long as there are two solutions battling it out, there will never be a critical mass established, and that will keep prices high," Gartner's Steve Kleynhans says. "You need a single standard in order to get economies of scale and broad public acceptance."Meanwhile, one potential upgrade to flash media could come in the form of ultradense probe storage, which is being developed by Seagate, among others. It's based on technology borrowed from electron microscopes, and it could well cram 10GB into a device the size of an SD Card.

Content by:




Read More......

The Future of Your PC NO.2


The Future of Your PC
(continued) NO.2

One Device to Rule Them All?The PC has been the window to the digital world for 25 years, but ways of accessing information continue to evolve. In this chart, we've taken an admittedly arbitrary crack at laying odds on which device will be your go-to gizmo in 2011.
Operating Systems: Vista Arrives...and EvolvesWindows Vista is now expected in early 2007. How will it change the way the Windows world works?David Siroky, a Microsoft veteran and the group product manager for Windows, says that Vista's enhancements fall into three major categories. The first, and most visible, is graphics. Unlike XP, Vista can use a computer's GPU for multiple tasks simultaneously. That's key, because Vista's Aero user interface is graphics intensive, and developers--for the first time--will be more easily able to use advanced graphics outside of games.Vista will likely change information management and data storage, as well. Says Siroky, "Now that there's no cost associated with taking a snapshot, people have a lot more photos to deal with." XP's lack of tools gave rise to a bustling market for photo software, but Vista indicates that Redmond has started to catch up. Users can tag photos with keywords or other metadata, and Vista's photo gallery simplifies locating your pictures.Elsewhere, Vista's integrated "reliability monitor" can show you a chart of how stable your system has been over time. If you experience a sudden spike in reliability problems, you can check what happened during those days and react appropriately.On the Linux front, the XGL and Compiz windowing systems, GUIs that can give Linux a pretty face, may outdo Apple OS X's Aqua interface in sheer awe factor. In Compiz the windows stretch and skew as you move them, and you can view multiple desktop environments in 3D as the cube-like workspace rotates.Apple's Leopard revision of OS X, due out next spring, will make incremental but steady improvements to the Mac operating system, adding such features as an automated backup utility and multiple workspaces. According to Gartner, both Linux and Mac OS will gain in user support, while research continues on the Web-based OS.
After Vista, What's Next?Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer has said that the company "won't ever take five years to develop another version of Windows." If that's true, and if the time between previous major consumer versions of Windows is any gauge, that places the successor to Windows Vista, code-named Vienna, on course for a 2010 or 2011 release. Our timeline has more details about Windows releases.
CPUs: The More Cores the MerrierWithin a few short years, AMD Athlon X2 and Intel Core 2 Duo CPUs will feel decidedly quaint, because multicore technology is just getting started. Jerry Bautista, director of technology management at Intel's Microprocessor Technology Lab, says he has already built prototype chips with eight cores. "Up to eight works well for productivity applications. But thousands of cores are possible. The trick is finding what's practical," he says. While dual-CPU Xeons (with a total of four cores) have been around for a while, this kind of power is finally coming to the masses. Both Intel and AMD plan to introduce quad-core chips. Intel's Kentsfield chip will arrive by year-end, while AMD's, known as K8L, is slated for mid-2007. AMD's 4x4 technology promises a dual-socket system using two Athlon 64-FX chips that will be available in time for the holidays.The limit for multicore technologies is really a software issue, as programs must be fundamentally redesigned to take advantage of parallel processing on a large scale. In other words, splitting a task across two or even four processor cores is relatively easy, but splitting it into dozens or hundreds of pieces is most definitely another thing altogether.Still, even with eight cores, expect to see dramatic performance improvements in complex programs, from games to search technologies. Simon Hayhurst, Adobe's director of product management for digital video and audio, says that most of Adobe's video applications already have elements that can make use of many cores, because previous work optimizing programs for hyperthreaded CPUs also works on multicore CPUs. Says Hayhurst, "The beauty of this approach is that we can write one piece of code that is hyperthreaded, which will scale up or down to multiple cores. We can soak up many more cores than are available today."The great leap in simultaneous processing capability is also likely to improve artificial intelligence. According to Intel's Bautista, "A video game's AI will be indistinguishable from what a person would do," forcing the player to take cover and track opponents organically rather than following an established script. He adds that such intelligence will extend to other applications, as well: "You will be able to search through thousands of photos and videos for people, certain backgrounds, or even specific facial expressions," he says.

Read More......

The Future of Your PC



The Future of Your PC
By Christopher Null, PC World

With breakthroughs such as faster multicore processors on the way, raw PC muscle is about to return with a vengeance. And it will come in more shapes and sizes than ever.
The PC of tomorrow will have more competition than ever in winning a place at the heart of your technological universe. But that doesn't mean that the PC will wither away into irrelevance--far from it. Computers are shaping up to become ever more specialized, and although they'll appear in innovative new forms, even the traditional desktop system will be with us for years to come, say the senior executives and industry experts we spoke to. Nevertheless, a peek at your future PC may not reveal what you expect.Eight-core processors, huge hard drives, the prospect of external graphics cards, and bigger and more affordable displays loom on the horizon. While some of the most tantalizing elements, like 20-terabyte drives or flexible full-color displays, are still a ways out, some of the must-have technology you've had your eye on may be closer than you first thought: Next-generation notebooks with detachable mini displays, for instance, are just around the corner.
Computers have been evolving into some radical designs--such as Media Center PCs and pint-size Shuttle systems--that only a few years ago would never have left the lab. From Acer's 20.1-inch "laptop" (weighing 17.3 pounds) to Dell's XPS M2010 (a 20.1-inch notebook/desktop hybrid), oddball systems are beginning to look, well, a little less odd.Still, Dell chief technology officer Kevin Kettler says that while designs like the M2010 are interesting exercises, they aren't quite the future. "[Traditional] desktops aren't going away any time soon," he notes. With emerging markets like China, demand for inexpensive PCs should stay strong.Despite efforts like Intel's Viiv initiative, which seeks to standardize media PC components, few observers are especially bullish about entertainment PCs. Notes Kettler, "The next couple of generations of wireless [standards] will allow you to access any type of media, anywhere in the house." You simply won't need an entertainment PC stuck beside a TV.Steve Kleynhans, vice president of client computing at analysis firm Gartner, says that mobile PCs will continue along the two current primary design trends: ultraportables under 4 pounds, and 15- to 17-inch desktop replacement notebooks pushing 8 to 10 pounds, and mostly meant to be used while plugged in.Scheduled for early 2007, Intel's fourth-generation Centrino notebook platform includes up to several gigabytes of fast NAND flash memory, which is expected to deliver faster boot times and application loading.And don't forget the dazzle: Vista's SideShow technology will allow laptop makers to include a display on the lid of the notebook, much like the external display on a clamshell cell phone. Want to check if you have an e-mail waiting? You won't even have to flip open the computer. PortalPlayer's Preface technology, expected in the first half of 2007, will work along with SideShow to provide a detachable display/PDA that you can use independently of the notebook.Beyond the next few years, fanciful designs rule. Jerry Bautista, director of technology management at Intel's Microprocessor Technology Labs, thinks chips could even be built into furniture or even woven into fabric: Imagine a PDA or cell phone built into your shirt sleeve.

Read More......

Coming Soon: Hot Deals on Closeout PCs

Coming Soon: Hot Deals on Closeout PCs
Edit Yardena Arar, PC World
Prices will be very friendly this holiday season, but know what you're getting.
We're fast approaching the home stretch of the busiest PC buying season, and that means retailers and e-tailers will be throwing out lures--all sorts of shiny new machines priced to move. This year more than most, the range of choices should be impressive, with new Core 2 Duo systems poised to duke it out with PCs based on older (but still quite serviceable) Intel and AMD chips. As a result, bargains should abound, experts say.
"I think there will be deals across the board," Roger Kay, founder and president of the technology research firm Endpoint Technologies, declares. "Prices will become very aggressive this holiday season," IDC analyst Richard Shim says.
Yet the abundance of options makes it more important than ever for you to know what you're buying. Dirt-cheap computers are nothing new, but this season many vendors will be trying to unload obsolete PCs alongside more modern hardware. Here are a few things to think about before signing the credit card slip.
Consider waiting for Windows VistaPC World will review the final version as soon as it's available, but I suspect many of you have already decided whether you want to have the new operating system sooner, later, or not at all. Where you stand on that question should play a big part in your shopping plans.
If you're bound and determined to get Vista as soon as you can, I would advise postponing a PC purchase until the OS launches in the early part of next year, when vendors should begin selling PCs with Vista preinstalled. I don't care how Vista-ready a Windows XP system is: Performing system upgrades just isn't much fun. And are you ready to bet that Vista drivers will be immediately available for all your components? I didn't think so.
"But," I can hear some of you grumbling, "I really want to buy now, and I'm ready, willing, and able to do the upgrade." Two words to remember before you buy: upgrade coupon. Most experts expect that by mid-fall, to encourage immediate PC purchases, many vendors will offer coupons for a free or discounted copy of Windows Vista (when it ships) to people who are buying Windows XP systems.
"I wouldn't get a machine after October that didn't have a [Vista] coupon," Endpoint's Kay says. Even if you aren't in a big rush to get Vista, you might still want it eventually--preferably on the PC vendor's dime, of course--so factor coupons into your buying decision.
And pay attention to which version of Vista the coupon is for. Microsoft says only the top two (out of three) consumer editions--Vista Home Premium (suggested upgrade price: $159) and Vista Ultimate (suggested upgrade price: $259)--will support the OS's snazzy Aero graphics, which feature semitransparent window frames and other visual tricks. You won't get the flashy stuff with the low-end Vista Home Basic (suggested upgrade price: $100).
Be ready to be Vista-readyThe corollary to not buying a computer unless it comes with a Vista upgrade coupon is that you shouldn't buy a system that can't handle Vista--or that, at the very least, can't easily be upgraded to handle Vista. And by "handle," I don't mean merely tolerate. If you want Vista at all, you want a system that can work smoothly with its Aero graphics and all of its enhancements--and one that won't choke if you decide to run a couple of applications simultaneously. In short, you'll want your new computer to be able to meet Microsoft's Vista Premium Ready requirements, rather than the puny Vista Capable requirements.
It's actually hard to find a new system containing a CPU that doesn't meet the Vista Premium Ready requirements (1 GHz for 32-bit CPUs or any 64-bit processor). True, you might have trouble tracking down a system based on Intel's red-hot Core 2 Duo chip priced at under $1000, "but there are other processors out there that are just as functional, and Intel is putting in some pretty deep price cuts for them," IDC's Shim says.
If you're trying to keep your purchase under $600 or $700, look for desktops based on older dual-core technology--perhaps one of Intel's Pentium D chips. Make sure, however, that you're paying less than you would for a system based on a Core 2 Duo chip, because even the low-end Core 2 Duo systems we've seen beat all but the fastest Pentium D systems in our WorldBench 5 test results. You should also be able to find deals on systems based on AMD's dual-core Athlon 64 X2.
Buy sufficient RAM and graphicsIt's somewhat more common to find PCs--especially notebooks--that don't have quite the system RAM or graphics hardware to run Vista at its best quality settings: Vendors sometimes skimp on these items to keep their costs down on a cheap system. To run Vista with all its bells and whistles, you need a minimum of 1GB of RAM and a DirectX 9-capable graphics processor equipped with at least 128MB of graphics memory and support for Pixel Shader 2.0 and 32 bits per pixel.
Also, don't rule out systems that have only integrated graphics: Some do meet the Vista requirements, and Microsoft says even the ones that rely on shared system memory will do just fine with 1GB of RAM (although you might want to add a little more just in case).
If you're not planning on upgrading to Vista right away, you won't need all that hardware--immediately. But if you think there's any possibility that you'll eventually spring for the upgrade, get a system with at least 1GB of RAM. In fact, to be Vista-ready down the road you should make sure you can upgrade to more than 1GB of RAM if your bargain machine has integrated graphics.
If you do purchase a computer with integrated graphics, also make sure its graphics subsystem meets the other specifications--the DX9 capability and the Pixel Shader 2.0 and 32-bits-per-pixel support--that Vista requires.
However, if your budget has any room for it, buy a system with a discrete graphics card. Doing so may even turn out to save you money: Ponying up for the card may cost less than buying additional RAM, and you'll certainly get better graphics performance.
Consider a notebookIf you're in the market for a laptop, IDC's Shim says you're in luck this year. "There's always been this price obstacle that kind of deterred the average consumer and forced them into the arms of the desktop makers," Shim says. "That's going away." Shim says the market should see a lot of attractive notebooks, even ultraportables, in the $1000-to-$1200 range.
Again, Core 2 Duo notebooks will command top dollar, but you should find a lot of attractively priced notebooks with older Core Duo processors from Intel or with AMD Turion 64 CPUs. And that's good news: In our tests, notebooks based on Core 2 Duo delivered only modest (at best) performance improvements over their similarly configured Core Duo-based predecessors (see "Mobile Core 2 Duo Delivers Only Slight Performance Gains"). So don't pay a fat premium for a Core 2 Duo-based portable. (But again, make sure not to skimp on RAM or graphics if you're planning a Vista upgrade sometime in the future.)
And what if you could not care less about Vista? Even if you prefer to stick with a familiar operating system (Microsoft says it will be supporting Windows XP for another three years), you probably still want decent performance. "I still think dual core's a good idea, even if you have XP," Endpoint's Kay says, noting that the technology will benefit anyone who multitasks, regardless of OS.
Whatever you buy, do your homework. With so much going on sale, you need to make sure you're getting a real deal.

Content by:


Read More......

Lenovo ThinkCentre A51 Ultra Small

Lenovo ThinkCentre A51 Ultra Small
Adequate expandability will keep this small-footprint PC on office desktops well into the future.
The Lenovo ThinkCentre A51's black case, which still carries the IBM logo, isn't as big as most "small form-factor" computers, but it houses a complete PC that can meet the computing needs of basic business users without exacerbating cubical clutter.
Equipped with a 3-GHz Pentium 4 531 CPU and 512MB of DDR2-533 SDRAM, the $1148 ThinkCentre A51 earned a score of 79 on our WorldBench 5 benchmark test--hardly blistering, but comparable to the performance of other systems running the same CPU. It's certainly fast enough to handle most mainstream business applications. Not surprisingly, frame rate scores on our Return to Castle Wolfenstein and Unreal Tournament games were very low, and the integrated Intel 915GV graphics produced uncomfortably choppy game play.
The unit offers most of the connectivity options of a larger PC: two USB ports, a microphone jack, and a headset jack appear on the front of the case, and two more USB ports plus ethernet, parallel, serial, and PS2 ports sit on the back.
There's no room inside the A51 for a second hard drive, so if an 80GB drive (the size that came on our system) doesn't meet your needs, you should specify a larger drive at the outset. The case comes with one open PCI slot, one open RAM slot, and no room for an additional optical drive. But you'll find that working on the A51 is refreshingly easy: Just push two buttons on the side of the case and the sides swing open, offering unhindered access to important areas of the interior. Shutting the case posed a bit of a challenge: We had to rearrange the bundled cables several times before the case would completely close.
The lightweight mouse had a flimsy feel, but the simple keyboard offered good key action and included an unusual extra: a built-in fingerprint scanner for security.
The minimal documentation accompanying the A51 consisted of a basic printed user manual and a more detailed manual on CD; there was no setup guide or poster. But setting up this system is pretty easy--you just plug the power, keyboard, and mouse cables into clearly marked ports on the back of the system.
Upshot: This well-designed office PC occupies little space and is easy to upgrade (in limited ways) to extend its useful life. -- Kirk Steers

Read More......

GeekTech: nVidia's Powerful, Complicated Quad SLI


GeekTech: nVidia's Powerful, Complicated Quad SLI
If you have a huge monitor, love games, and have money to burn you'll probably want nVidia's latest and greatest--but be sure your PC maker knows what it's doing.Part 1 of a special five-part series. -->
Edit By Tom Mainelli, PC World

It's too expensive. It's too complicated. And it's likely to run basic apps--the ones most of us use every day--a bit slower than a single-card system. So why would you buy a desktop with nVidia's new, high-end Quad SLI technology?
Because you wanna play Oblivion at superhigh resolutions and settings on a massive 30-inch display, that's why. And because (of course) you have entirely too much money.
The thing is, just spending a ton of money on a Quad SLI system may not get you what you want. There's nothing wrong with the technology; but if your PC vendor doesn't implement it correctly, you're stuck with an expensive desktop that has more bark than bite.
Mega-Resolution Technology
When nVidia launched Quad SLI, it said the technology was for people who wanted an "Extreme HD" gaming experience. The technology uses a pair of giant graphics cards, each containing two ultra-high-end 7900 GTX graphics chips. The result is something like a video-processing supercomputer that can crank out impressive frame rates at high resolutions, such as 1920 by 1200 and 2560 by 1600, while using extreme antialiasing settings (to smooth jagged edges) and steep anisotropic filtering settings (to help render crisper textures).
In fact, if you don't have a big monitor capable of running those resolutions--such as Dell's 24-inch or 30-inch monsters--or the cash to buy one, don't bother with Quad SLI. The folks at nVidia will tell you that--just ask them.
Another thing they'll tell you is that Quad SLI is indeed a complicated technology, which is why you can't currently buy dual-chip cards to use in building your own system. A Quad SLI PC requires several particular components--like a power supply powerful enough to run the sun--and some specific motherboard and BIOS tweaks.
The companies selling these high-end systems are supposed to know all of these things; but unfortunately, the one that sent us our system apparently did not.
Big, Bad, and Slow?
The Quad SLI system we tested came from Aeoncraft. Our shipping $4495 Aeon-8000 Quad came stuffed with high-end components, including an AMD Athlon FX-60 processor, 2GB of Corsair memory, two 150GB Western Digital Raptor 10,000 RPM hard drives, and--of course--the two gigantic graphics cards.
Despite that impressive array of hardware, the system didn't perform on a par with its pedigree in our initial tests.
In WorldBench 5 tests, the PC earned a score of 119. That's not slow, but it's well below the mark of 142 posted by our current top performer, Xi Computer's MTower 64 AGI-SLI (which has the same CPU and same amount of memory as the Aeon-8000 Quad, but uses a single, older GeForce 7800 GTX graphics board).
Equally surprising was the Aeon's performance on our admittedly basic desktop graphics tests: It managed a frame rate of 372 frames per second on Unreal Tournament 2003 at 1280 by 1024 resolution, compared to the Xi's frame rate of 438 fps. The two systems' scores on Return to Castle Wolfenstein were nearly identical, however. (As noted, nVidia suggests running Quad SLI at a resolution of 1680 by 1050 or higher, but our basic tests max out at 1280 by 1024.)
Because of the overhead of running four GPUs, we expected the Quad SLI to run a tad slower than a comparably equipped system with a single card. And let's face it, nobody is buying a system like this to type Microsoft Word documents and surf the Web. Still, the performance results we recorded were clearly out of whack. To see whether the Quad SLI was responsible for the system's mediocre overall numbers, we removed one of the dual-GPU boards, disabled one of the two GPUs on the remaining board, and reran our tests. The system's WorldBench 5 score rocketed to 136.
We shared our testing information with Aeoncraft and (more specifically) nVidia, to help us figure out what was going on. It turned out that our high-end system needed some fine-tuning.
Under the Hood
After much back-and-forth with nVidia, we determined that Aeoncraft had shipped us a PC with the wrong BIOS, some incorrect settings, and a slightly dated video driver. The driver part is forgivable--these things rev all the time--but the BIOS issues suggest sloppy craftsmanship, especially on a system this pricey.
After installing the proper BIOS, we reran our basic WorldBench 5 tests, and the system scored a much more reasonable 134--not tops, but pretty good. The system did a lot better on our basic desktop graphics tests, too.
Of course, where a system like this should really shine is with games. To test this sucker at the resolutions nVidia recommends, we had to reconfigure a couple of our standard graphics tests. But even at high resolutions, the system posted mixed results at typical antialiasing and anisotropic filtering settings.
For example, in our FarCry test (with antialiasing at 4X and anisotropic filtering at 8X), the Quad setup registered 85 fps at 1920 by 1200 resolution and 48 fps at 2560 by 1600 resolution, whereas a Dual SLI setup (with two standard 7900 GTX boards) posted 94 fps and 59 fps, respectively. A single 7900 GTX board hit speeds of 65 fps and 33 fps on the same tests.
Our Doom 3 tests showed similar numbers for both the Quad and Dual SLI systems at the same settings: the Quad SLI posted 105 fps and 51 fps, the Dual SLI hit 103 fps and 56 fps, and the single card notched 65 fps and 30 fps.
Show of Strength
Not until we moved out of the game setting and cranked up the SLI-only antialiasing and anisotropic filtering settings did the Quad SLI finally show some world-class muscle.
In our Doom 3 test running at 1920 by 1200 resolution with SLI settings at 8X antialiasing and 16X anisotropic filtering, the Quad SLI system posted 86 fps versus 64 fps for the Dual SLI system. And at 2560 by 1600 resolution, the Quad hit 48 fps while the Dual posted 29 fps.
In our Far Cry test using the same settings, the Quad SLI achieved 84 fps versus 49 fps for the Dual SLI at 1920 by 1200 resolution, and it rolled out 46 fps against 28 fps for the Dual SLI at 2560 by 1600 resolution.
Does anyone need to run a game at such high antialiasing and anisotropic filtering settings? I don't think so. In fact while I believe that these technologies contribute to better-looking game play, I'm unconvinced that such super-high settings enhance what the average person perceives on screen. But do some people want to run them that high anyway? Sure they do.
In the end, Quad SLI does offer performance benefits when you use the right combination of resolution and settings. But I wouldn't recommend it unless you're fanatical about gaming, you have enough money to buy a giant monitor, and you've convinced yourself that you can see the difference between 4X and 8X antialiasing (by the way, Quad SLI actually offers up to 32X antialiasing).
What about Aeoncraft and their setup snafu? The company gets credit for coming clean about its mistakes, and a rep assures me that Aeoncraft is shipping new systems with the right settings and is working with existing Quad SLI owners to get their rigs up to speed. Still, I find it disheartening that any PC vendor would offer such an expensive product without knowing how to make it work the way it's supposed to. Maybe that's why I'm so big on building my own PCs: I know who to blame if something doesn't work right.

Content by:


Read More......

© 2008 Gizmoza.COM All rights reserved.Any comment please contact Administrators master934@hotmail.com